Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Innovative communication by the music producers behind the hits?
Royal College of Music in Stockholm, Department of Music and Media Production.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4939-0938
Royal College of Music in Stockholm, Department of Music and Media Production.
Royal College of Music in Stockholm, Department of Music and Media Production.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7220-1459
2023 (English)In: Innovation In Music Conference 2023 Abstracts book: ‘You’re not supposed to do that’ / [ed] Dave Hook, Paul Harkins & Zack Moir, Edinburgh: Edinburgh Napier University & Innovation In Music , 2023Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Swedish pop and rock music producers have contributed to major international successes in recent decades. Despite this, only a few researchers have studied the professional knowledge of these producers and what they do in their work. What producers do and their knowledge is something of a black box. Understanding producers' professional knowledge is essential for future producers, decision-makers and educators to create the conditions for tomorrow's success. However, what are the core competencies and skills apart from technical expertise? What is in the black box? This study mainly focuses on how producers communicate with musicians, artists, and other producer colleagues. These are the research questions: What characterizes explicit communication verbally or in other ways? Is there implicit communication, and how does it differ from explicit communication? Which communication is necessary and which is superfluous? Is there communication that can hinder a fruitful process during a music production session? Are there innovative multimodal communication methods that are particularly useful in music production? How do different producers use different communication strategies? Theoretically, this research rests on several legs. First, Kurt Blaukopf's music sociology is an interdisciplinary approach rather than a discipline (Blaukopf, 2003; Blaukopf & Zembylas, 2012; Smudits, 2019). Blaukopf devoted most of his professional life to formulating and practising in various fields, focusing on music as music activity, the desire for music and musical autonomy in shaping and changing complex conditions of existence. This sociology of music is complemented by other theories and theorizations, such as Howard Becker's contributions to the understanding of art worlds (Becker, 2008), Robert K. Merton's theoretical theme on opportunity structures (Merton, 1996), Jennifer Lena's and Rickard Peterson's models on how music cultures and genres evolve (Lena & Peterson, 2008), Ronald F. Inglehart's work on people's values and behaviours (Inglehart, 2018). Since creativity is a concept often referred to as a quality marker or authenticity indicator in music production, Harrison C. White's work with careers and creativity in music and music creation and artistry (White, 2008, 2020) and theories of creativity in music production is developed by Paul Thompson (2016, 2019) and Phillip McIntyre (2011, 2012, 2018) as well as various theories of authenticity further essential starting points. This paper aims to report results from observational studies and interviews with active music producers included in the project. One observation from the data we collected is that there are apparent similarities between how producers give instructions and guidance to how teachers work in music education and the supervision of students in higher education. However, the knowledge music producers use in their daily practice regarding communication with others tends to be based on personal experience after trial and error or on imitating how important predecessors and leaders in music production have acted. As a result, there are considerable variations in how different producers react. However, the common thing is that few bases their work on previous research on feedback and supervision, but they may have a lot to gain by trying it.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Edinburgh: Edinburgh Napier University & Innovation In Music , 2023.
National Category
Music Sociology Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kmh:diva-5153OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kmh-5153DiVA, id: diva2:1818299
Conference
Innovation In Music Conference 2023Edinburgh Napier University, UK30 June - 2 July 2023
Available from: 2023-12-10 Created: 2023-12-10 Last updated: 2025-09-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

‘You’re not supposed to do that’

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gullö, Jan-OlofFlorén, Thomas
By organisation
Department of Music and Media Production
MusicSociologyEducational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 775 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf